Cheney is wrong when she implies that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act was adopted primarily to protect waterfowl. She is wrong when she implies that the act was adopted primarily to control sport hunting. She is wrong when she suggests that the act was never intended to protect birds from the machinations of the market and industry. Her amendment attacks the very foundations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
Please log in to continue |